3 ms·
If you need this and that to impress your clients, wouldn't it be more rational if the -company- owned the house and paid for the resort? Then when they replace
by m_eiman 18y ago
If you need this and that to impress your clients, wouldn't it be more rational if the -company- owned the house and paid for the resort? Then when they replace their CEO they could continue using the same impressive resources instead of having the new CEO buy the same stuff once more.
Even the goverment does this - puts new presidents in the same old White House instead of letting each new one build his own.
- m_eiman 18y agoAnd perhaps even more interesting - who gave money to the clients to spend on such unproductive things? It's the client's money that pays for everything in the end, of course. I'm sure it's human nature to fall for flattery and impressive displays of wealth, but since most of this money comes from institutions of various kinds (many of them owned or controlled by governments around the world), there should be a at least a decent amount of checking what the money is used for. It's one thing to waste your own money this way, but quite another to waste other people's (sp?) money.