I made a point. You didn't have an answer, you still have no answer. I made fun of you, because you lacked an answer and instead took single examples from very

I made a point. You didn't have an answer, you still have no answer. I made fun of you, because you lacked an answer and instead took single examples from very heterogenous groups (not even correct, you couldn't answer yread). You ignored that. Instead, you grumble when I dismiss you because you seem to consistently support dictators against democracies. After being unable to argue my points, you are only writing to claim that FSA is supported by NATO, despite not answering "yread"'s questioning of your last claim. (Are you actively looking for discussions to write this?) Some simple points: 1. Obama has, according to all news, been unwilling to support FSA with weapons, no-fly zones, etc -- despite e.g. bombings of suburbs filled with civilians. This shame comes from under table dealings with Russia and/or fear of islamists getting support. 2. Your first link discussed how the British might talk to FSA, not that NATO supports them actively and about e.g. how the Syrian army shells suburbs -- NOT that the US had joined the war, which you claimed. I didn't check the rest. 3. Your one-eyed criticism of one side and ignoring the artillery/bombs against cities, torture, etc, etc, etc from the other side tells volumes. 4. It is hard to see if you're a troll, a leftwing extremist or some paid Iranian "50 cent army" shill. But that doesn't matter, the difference between a griefer, a "useful idiot" and a propagandist is minimal: You're a complete waste of time, at best.