4 ms·
the "vim" entry contains too many "I"'s and "me"'s. Which is fine for a site that values 'opinion', but I am wary of accepting opinions from what looks to be an
by nsomaru 14y ago
the "vim" entry contains too many "I"'s and "me"'s. Which is fine for a site that values 'opinion', but I am wary of accepting opinions from what looks to be an anonymous source.
Something objective like this seems far more appealing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors
- StuieK 14y agoTo be honest that topic is in need of a lot of improvement. We do "objective" viewpoints well when the topic has matured, for example: http://slant.co/topics/what-is-the-best-search-engine-for-web-applications/opinions/elasticsearch http://slant.co/topics/what-is-the-best-search-engine-for-we... We are also building a comparison matrix feature soon that will show something similar to your link. Also we are going to be working a lot on transparency around who contributed. Give us a couple months and I hope we can help you research subjective things "objectively"