4 ms·
I wasn't claiming that wasn't biased. It was stated that nobody was talking about it, but I don't think that's the case. I've heard it since the health care deb
by larrywright 14y ago
I wasn't claiming that wasn't biased. It was stated that nobody was talking about it, but I don't think that's the case. I've heard it since the health care debates started in the U.S.
As for that study, I'm a little concerned that they only looked at a handful of states, and this little line at the bottom:
"The authors acknowledge financial support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (formerly the Medical Research Council of Canada) for this research."
My guess: both your source and mine are biased and flawed, and the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
- rowanseymour 14y agoThat's a peer reviewed academic journal. Even if the authors have a bias, it's not comparable to the bias of a right wing advocacy group that gets financial support from the Koch Brothers.