I already saw that, but you see, it's not better. It's not useful at all. The amazing thing about the Slate article is that it gives a list of several possible

I already saw that, but you see, it's not better. It's not useful at all. The amazing thing about the Slate article is that it gives a list of several possible issues you can have when you observe that eating wheat gives you a problem. I have pretty much ruled out actual celiac disease (though not officially); my symptoms just aren't that serious. It's pretty certain I have one of the other two afflictions listed in the Slate article, or possibly something similar that they just forgot to mention.