ya I agree. I don't like that behavior at all (I hate false positives more than I hate spam). I just remember there being debate/discussion about this before.

ya I agree. I don't like that behavior at all (I hate false positives more than I hate spam). I just remember there being debate/discussion about this before. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tzink/archive/2011/08/09/why-silently-dropping-mail-is-a-bad-idea.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tzink/archive/2011/08/09/why-silentl... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_delivery_report#Silently_dropping_messages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_delivery_report#Silently_dr... "As discussed in Section 7.8 and Section 7.9 below, dropping mail without notification of the sender is permitted in practice. However, it is extremely dangerous and violates a long tradition and community expectations that mail is either delivered or returned. If silent message-dropping is misused, it could easily undermine confidence in the reliability of the Internet's mail systems. So silent dropping of messages should be considered only in those cases where there is very high confidence that the messages are seriously fraudulent or otherwise inappropriate."