3 ms·
This service looks really well thought out. I am currently looking for a service exactly like this however, rather than a pay by week service, I'd really like
by jonwinstanley 14y ago
This service looks really well thought out.
I am currently looking for a service exactly like this however, rather than a pay by week service, I'd really like to pay per task or to be able to buy blocks of time, maybe 10 hours at a time.
I realise that may mean I am not your target market, but I feel that getting to the bottom of my current to do list may only take 10 hours of someones time. So I don't really want to sign up to a pay weekly type service and have to remember to cancel.
Also - I would not want to have to split my tasks into ones to sort out this week and ones for next week. I'd like to get them all done at once.
- anandkulkarni 14y agoWe used to have an "hourly" model, and may bring it back. Would this be of interest to you? The reason we do a weekly model is that it lets us plan capacity.
- jonwinstanley 14y agoPersonally, I would prefer it, but I realise it may be confusing to your customers to have two totally different pricing methods. How did the hourly model perform when you used it before?
- anandkulkarni 14y agoIt was reasonably popular, but difficult to predict usage. You can still see it there - it's not labeled as such, but it's the "Starter" plan -- this will bill you per hour, with a minimum of one per week.
- _lex 14y agoI'd be interested in hiring for hourly work, but I'm not sure how much work I need to send out per week. I suspect others are like me. It would be nice if we could pay a monthly maintenance fee and then just pay $10/hr, or whatever. It would be even better if we could just pay $15/hr during spike times.