3 ms·

Lighttpd is missing... but good benchmark anyway.

• niggler 14y ago
  Given the usage numbers (looking at netcraft) the two most popular engines were compared. Its a fair comparison, especially when you note that IIS doesnt run in linux. Lighttpd isn't even big enough to warrant a mention http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2013/02/01/february-2013-web-server-survey.html http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2013/02/01/february-2013-w...
• nodesocket 14y ago
  I actually really like the lighttpd config structure, but its not actively maintained and doesn't have the amazing community that nginx has. It is clear that nginx has won the high performance web-server battle..
  • raylu 14y ago
    The sensible config syntax is the reason I still use lighttpd. http://wiki.nginx.org/IfIsEvil http://wiki.nginx.org/IfIsEvil
• papsosouid 14y ago
  >Lighttpd is missing That's like saying thttpd is missing. It isn't tested because it isn't relevant.