3 ms·
Doubt it. Quite sure you'd take it with both hands. Seeing as you work in the oil industry - the above statement does strike one as being exceedingly odd. You
by confluence 14y ago
Doubt it. Quite sure you'd take it with both hands.
Seeing as you work in the oil industry - the above statement does strike one as being exceedingly odd. You are in the industry for the money aren't you?
That's some serious cognitive dissonance you've got there.
Furthermore, I thought you guys pumped misery out of the ground day in, day out?
- Cushman 14y ago> Doubt it. Quite sure you'd take it with both hands. Damn, now even I'm thinking I'd turn that down to teach your selfish ass a lesson. You're confused because you're thinking about this (selfishly) as money being granted to you, and expecting your partner to do the same. Your parent (pun intended) is considering the whole relationship: Money will be redistributed from a researcher R to A and B only if A and B can agree on a fair distribution method. This will alter the balance of power between these three agents at a minimum. A and B should agree to this only if they both feel it is globally optimal; the more unfair the distribution A chooses, the more likely that this change is for the worse overall, which places increasing moral pressure on B to veto.
- D_Alex 14y ago>You are in the industry for the money aren't you? Not really. In case you are interested, I am in the industry by accident. >I thought you guys pumped misery out of the ground day in, day out? No, we pump oil. And gas. By and large, these things are used to create a whole lot of happiness.