4 ms·
I'm not real rich, but I'd turn you down. Someone so selfish running around with close to a billion dollars...no. The misery you could cause! Let the researcher
by D_Alex 14y ago
I'm not real rich, but I'd turn you down. Someone so selfish running around with close to a billion dollars...no. The misery you could cause! Let the researcher keep their money, they will probably offer it to someone more deserving in the next round.
- confluence 14y agoDoubt it. Quite sure you'd take it with both hands. Seeing as you work in the oil industry - the above statement does strike one as being exceedingly odd. You are in the industry for the money aren't you? That's some serious cognitive dissonance you've got there. Furthermore, I thought you guys pumped misery out of the ground day in, day out?
- Cushman 14y ago> Doubt it. Quite sure you'd take it with both hands. Damn, now even I'm thinking I'd turn that down to teach your selfish ass a lesson. You're confused because you're thinking about this (selfishly) as money being granted to you, and expecting your partner to do the same. Your parent (pun intended) is considering the whole relationship: Money will be redistributed from a researcher R to A and B only if A and B can agree on a fair distribution method. This will alter the balance of power between these three agents at a minimum. A and B should agree to this only if they both feel it is globally optimal; the more unfair the distribution A chooses, the more likely that this change is for the worse overall, which places increasing moral pressure on B to veto.
- D_Alex 14y ago>You are in the industry for the money aren't you? Not really. In case you are interested, I am in the industry by accident. >I thought you guys pumped misery out of the ground day in, day out? No, we pump oil. And gas. By and large, these things are used to create a whole lot of happiness.