4 ms·

Been a while since I've been to news.yc, but I've been reading the RSS feeds more recently, so thought I should pimp my new job at some stage :) Feedback welco

• lkozma 18y ago
  Crawling should respect the excluded pages in robots.txt and rel="nofollow" directives.
  • zemaj 18y ago
    That's a tough one. This has been much debated, but at the end of the day we decided to go with our own filtering system since robots.txt and rel="nofollow" are created with search engines in mind, not spell checking. In general you want search engines to cover a subset of what you want spell checked. You can filter on any CSS3 selector & a[rel="nofollow"] would block no-follow links if you don't want them included. By default we filter out any block with a class or an id that contains "comment" which does a pretty good job of filtering a lot of user comments.
    • dangoldin 18y ago
      You could always just have an option for it. I feel people would trust your tool more if they are able to tell it what to ignore.
      • zemaj 18y ago
        That was the intention of choosing CSS selectors over robots.txt or nofollow, although a checkbox to specify following robots.txt & nofollow would be useful as you say.
    • fizx 18y ago
      Which lib are you using for selector filtering?
• known 18y ago
  Good one and complements http://www.sitereportcard.com/ http://www.sitereportcard.com/