3 ms·
But in that way your Haskell code examples seem to not be valid Haskell anymore. Seems to be a rather pointless change for the sake of simply breaking things.
by anonymouz 14y ago
But in that way your Haskell code examples seem to not be valid Haskell anymore. Seems to be a rather pointless change for the sake of simply breaking things.
- loup-vaillant 14y agoWell, given this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5278883 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5278883 I now believe the notation needs to be explained anyway. I'll switch back to '\'.