3 ms·
It's not the courts decision that's jarring, it's the argumentation. If the court argued from human unreliability in enumerating options, the judgement would b
by Anderkent 14y ago
It's not the courts decision that's jarring, it's the argumentation.
If the court argued from human unreliability in enumerating options, the judgement would be sensible. But simply arguing from a mistaken understanding of probability makes it look silly.