The "in crowd" is just trying to pick winners. To the extent that Inocente is a success, the "in crowd" would like to fund it. This is revolutionary when it bec

The "in crowd" is just trying to pick winners. To the extent that Inocente is a success, the "in crowd" would like to fund it. This is revolutionary when it becomes a reliable way to fund flops. But "we the people" don't want flops, by definition. So, there's something incongruous or self-contradictory in your comment, I think.