3 ms·
Wow, this is extremely cool. I thought the article was a little fluffy but the end really made me think: "What's frustrating is that all these companies in th
by habosa 14y ago
Wow, this is extremely cool. I thought the article was a little fluffy but the end really made me think:
"What's frustrating is that all these companies in the Valley, they're ideas for the 1 or 10 percent," Collison said. "You have startups like Uber or Taskrabbit, that's like, ‘Oh, here's something to help you find a driver or find someone to clean your house.' Are they solving real problems?"
The San Quentin inmates "were talking about urban obesity, or PTSD", Collison said. "It's a completely different perspective. We actually really need that."
That couldn't be more true. There might be an excess of startups, but there are too few solving really important problems. It might take the viewpoint of someone who has been through very hard times to understand what we should really be working on. It's not another GMail replacement app (although that's cool too), it's actually changing the physical world we live in.
- confluence 14y agoThat couldn't be more stupid. There's a very simple reason why startups target rich consumers - it's because they have money, and without it, resource constrained startups die. Important problems are for NGOs, national governements, hundred billion dollar universities and international organizations to solve. The very reason problems so important still exist is for the fundamental reason that they require huge amounts of resources over many years at little to no return on investment to the business. Going after "important problems" as a startup is a very fast way of becoming bankrupt.
- habosa 14y agoRich consumers can have serious problems too. There is definitely a middle ground between Uber and fighting disease.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]