3 ms·
It's a decision that should be up to the author. And I personally have complete respect for both decisions.
by axod 18y ago
It's a decision that should be up to the author. And I personally have complete respect for both decisions.
- mahmud 18y agoRespects. But allow me to add that the great majority of web startups are running on the value of a "social network". Remove the users and the service is worth nothing. You can't say that about shrink-wrap software; even if the great majority of the people don't use it, there is that one or two lucrative corporate or government contract to make it all worthwhile. So in that light, shouldn't the users of web apps be entitled to something a little more than "free use"? Say, a little assurance that the platform they trust so much of their private lives is transparent, extensible, and should the company sink tomorrow, available for replication? What happens when you strike it rich, sell the startup to a Mega Corp and move to Tahiti? The users will be at the mercy of greedy suits who will fill data warehouses with every click, persona and profile of your users, the very same people who made you rich.
- axod 18y agoI agree, once you've grown to pretty much the size you'll be, and have captured a good amount of your sectors market, for many social based webapps releasing the source code may be a win. Reddit didn't suddenly drop in usage when they did.