4 ms·
Link to full study? News are notoriously bad at interpreting researches. First of all, 25 people is a small sample. It could be that the study luckly found eno
by inerte 14y ago
Link to full study? News are notoriously bad at interpreting researches.
First of all, 25 people is a small sample. It could be that the study luckly found enough people to make the data sing this song.
Second, work more/harder doesn't mean "better than those in the office".
- eksith 14y agoI'm guessing this is the actual article : http://tja.org.au/index.php/tja/article/view/390 http://tja.org.au/index.php/tja/article/view/390 Full text requires subscription, though. Yeah, 25 is no sample at all. I mean, I work from home, but that's only because that works for my current situation and the type of work I do. There are a million other factors that can affect productivity either way.