I know of no jurisdiction where there's a right to legal representation during a raid. This makes complete sense, because otherwise you could attempt to hold up

I know of no jurisdiction where there's a right to legal representation during a raid. This makes complete sense, because otherwise you could attempt to hold up a raid and dispose of evidence whilst you waited for your legal counsel to get there. Your can argue about what is and isn't admissible post the raid. So I don't really think in that particular example any 'right' was taken from him.