4 ms·
> Are you suggesting that the need to do more than the law says? No, all I'm suggesting is that Google removes this link [1] as asked by the author of the book
by doe88 14y ago
> Are you suggesting that the need to do more than the law says?
No, all I'm suggesting is that Google removes this link [1] as asked by the author of the book. Again, I fail to see what's hard to understand.
> Whatever Google does, the content is still available. It's been posted to Usenet news at least once. (http://binsearch.info/?q=Object+Oriented+Software+Constructi... http://binsearch.info/?q=Object+Oriented+Software+Constructi...)
Google is not responsible for others indexing systems, I've never said otherwise.
[1] http://www.imagebam.com/image/e2e9df239055991 http://www.imagebam.com/image/e2e9df239055991
- packetslave 14y agoIf you look carefully, you'll note that the link in your screenshot is not the same as the one in Dr. Meyer's DMCA complaint.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- DanBC 14y agoThey did remove the link that the author asked them to remove. That just promoted another link to a pirate version of the book up the list. A useful service might be something that helps tell Indonesian colleges that they've allowed directory traversal open, and that they have copyright violating materials available to the world. Or a tool that helps gather a list of all the IP owners of a collection of material at a site (the site in the image also has other books, as well as a 4.3 GB iso called "IBM_RSA_V803" (I'm guessing it's IBM's Rational Software Architect?) and then helps with coordinate a collaborative request for IP takedown effort.