5 ms·
> Given two equally capable candidates, the one with the degree is better. This doesn't have to be "true" to be useful. A positive correlation is a valuable to
by Thrymr 14y ago
> Given two equally capable candidates, the one with the degree is better.
This doesn't have to be "true" to be useful. A positive correlation is a valuable tool as well.
- LogicX 14y agoUnfortunately I presume research could be done on (bonus if someone knows of and can reference) the measure of a qualified candidate decreasing as more candidates enter the 'have a degree' pool. It may have previously been a stronger correlation, but I'd imagine that correlation is weakening, and if current trends continue of colleges accepting lower and lower qualified candidates, and the lines blurring between different colleges and the level of graduates they're pumping out -- it will eventually be meaningless, as they'll hand degrees to anyone who will pay (or more likely indebt themselves).
- nilkn 14y ago"True" in this context wouldn't mean anything more to me than a significant positive correlation. How do you know there is a positive correlation? I can think of several reasons why there wouldn't be. In particular, a college graduate will tend to be unsatisfied with a job for which he or she is overqualified, leading to a drop in morale and an increase in turnover.