4 ms·
I guess, Rubinius is no longer relevant? I remember it was a very promising project back in 2008.
by oleganza 14y ago
I guess, Rubinius is no longer relevant? I remember it was a very promising project back in 2008.
- jxf 14y agoEvan Phoenix (the creator) left in 2012 to work for LivingSocial. EngineYard, his former employer, had been funding work on it last I heard, but there haven't been any releases since 2011. http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2012/03/28/a-new-door-opens/ http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2012/03/28/a-new-door-opens/
- regularfry 14y agoOnly in the same sense that there haven't been any Arch releases... EDIT: Just checked. If you `rvm install rbx`, you get code written today.
- steveklabnik 14y ago> there haven't been any releases since 2011. Every commit is a release of rbx. Yay continuous integration! That said, there hasn't been a numbered release in a while, through there will be a 2.0.
- jxf 14y agoYes, sorry for not being clearer. I'm basing the "there hasn't been a release since 2011" comment off of the Rubinius homepage, where the last numbered release is 1.2.4. The Rubinius 2.0 preview release came out in June 2011: http://rubini.us/2011/06/07/inside-rubinius-20-preview/ http://rubini.us/2011/06/07/inside-rubinius-20-preview/
- regularfry 14y agohttps://github.com/rubinius/rubinius https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius It's very relevant, and very active.
- mixonic 14y agoI really wish Rubinius has become Ruby 2.0. Making Ruby more Ruby and less C opens lots of doors.