4 ms·
Right! So imagine how much slower it would be if the process involved getting the Linux community to agree with Microsoft on a standard. I realize it's not quit
by seldo 14y ago
Right! So imagine how much slower it would be if the process involved getting the Linux community to agree with Microsoft on a standard. I realize it's not quite the bad old days anymore, but still.
- simula67 14y agoWhy does it have to be one or the other? Why can't we standardize on one file system that has to be supported by all OSes out of the box and provides fairly good read/write speed with no artificial file size limits such as FAT32 and let innovation take place inside other file systems ?
- lmm 14y agoUDF is pretty much that
- richardwhiuk 14y agoFAT32 doesn't have an artificial file size limit - it has a file size limit which was perfectly reasonable when it was developed. All filesystems have file size limits - it's not an artificial constraint, it's a design tradeoff in terms of the size of the metadata that the file system requires.