3 ms·
>it's simpler to copy the files or provide a network interface to them Ding ding ding. Much easier to have a Samba server then try to make a FS work across mul
by drivebyacct2 14y ago
>it's simpler to copy the files or provide a network interface to them
Ding ding ding. Much easier to have a Samba server then try to make a FS work across multiple OSes. That having been said, I haven't really had that much issue with using NTFS.
- dhruvmittal 14y agoGenerally, Linux has pretty great support for reading and writing on ntfs (I want to say ntfs-3g is usually a default on most distros?), but Windows can't natively read ext3/ext4/btrfs. It's doable, though, with programs like diskinternals linux reader and explore2fs. However, these programs tend to be read-only, forcing you to copy files across to a windows-readable fs.