Maybe you shouldn't try so hard to deliberately misunderstand what I'm saying. Your nitpicking doesn't change the fact that you can redefine what == does in you

Maybe you shouldn't try so hard to deliberately misunderstand what I'm saying. Your nitpicking doesn't change the fact that you can redefine what == does in your own classes. I hope you do realise that my point isn't even specifically about Scala, but about syntactical abstraction in general.