3 ms·
You're wrong. The 'property' is a method on the Function prototype - take a closer look. Anyway, style does matter and were this line written with readability
by klibertp 14y ago
You're wrong. The 'property' is a method on the Function prototype - take a closer look.
Anyway, style does matter and were this line written with readability in mind you wouldn't make this mistake.
Also, I would definitely abstract over @get and property:
makeProperty = (attrs...) ->
func = () -> (@get(x) for x in attrs).join(" ")
func.property(attrs...)
MyApp.president = Ember.Object.create(
fullName: makeProperty("firstName", "lastName")
)
The parens after create are not needed, the next indented line should tell us that this is a function with arguments, but I don't mind them here.
- cubicle67 14y agogah! you're right! I've attempted to update my comment with corrected code, but given my caffeine and sleep deprived state there's a good chance it's just as wrong as my original effort :/
- knieveltech 14y agoIf it takes that much effort to gin up example code I think the point has been made.
- klibertp 14y agoYou're joking, right? If not, then you're trying to generalize one line of shitty code and one mistake of a tired programmer to the whole language - and I don't believe you'd want to do that!
- avenger123 14y agoClever or hard to read code is just that. I don't use CoffeeScript but I wouldn't use this example to be mean about it. At the end of the day, it is an acquired taste. My only concern is I don't have the time to invest to make a decision on it and I would suspect others are in the same boat. So, by default we choose a tentative no.