3 ms·
If that's so, it doesn't mean Axelrod is wrong, but that his results depend on the timescale. Which is one of many parameters...
by slurgfest 14y ago
If that's so, it doesn't mean Axelrod is wrong, but that his results depend on the timescale. Which is one of many parameters...
- batemanesque 14y agothat's true, but I think (could be wrong) that Axelrod presented his results as "definitive" given that no-one had simulated a comparable timescale before. it was certainly presented as such in the textbook I was reading from.