4 ms·
"'What was missing from the market was the notion of the unified experience,' [Robertson] said." I don't understand the obsession people have with cramming tho
by karzeem 19y ago
"'What was missing from the market was the notion of the unified experience,' [Robertson] said." I don't understand the obsession people have with cramming thousands of apps into a single site. It seems to miss the point of the web. Isn't it much better for apps to run on their own sites with their own interfaces? Interoperability and sharing data between apps is huge, but the answer is not to put all apps on the same site. What are users supposed to think? "Oo, feature-crippled versions of all my favorite apps!" Web desktops strike me as having the worst of both worlds: none of the feature richness of the web and none of the UI advantages of the desktop. For non-power users, having everything in one place doesn't seem compelling enough to ignore that.
In fairness, the writer may have taken Robertson's comment out of context or altered its meaning, so apologies if that wasn't the fairest launching pad for a rant about web OSes.
- cstejerean 19y agoI've been asking myself the same question for a while. I would like a unified experience so I have to spend less time worrying about interoperability, etc. On the other hand having a choice about every application means I can have the best application in every category. I wonder where the middle ground lies.
- karzeem 19y agoFacebook is probably one of the best unified experiences, but I guess if you're looking for something very OS-y, something like this is more your bag. Users shouldn't have to be the ones to worry about interoperability, but c'est la vie. Now if I can only find a French phrase about balancing trade-offs...