3 ms·
If expensive human curation of research papers is valuable, that's fine with me. Let the non-public funded curation be proprietary. But that's no reason to lo
by robrenaud 14y ago
If expensive human curation of research papers is valuable, that's fine with me. Let the non-public funded curation be proprietary.
But that's no reason to lock up the publicly funded research papers themselves.
- MBlume 14y agoRight, Nature can publish a list of URLS which in their opinion is worth reading, and they can charge $50k to read that list if they like. Keep the papers in the open, is all.