4 ms·
That's not Amdahl's law in reverse, that's just Amdahl's law as applied to mulitcore. This was all worked out over a decade ago [1]. [1] M. Hill and M. Marty.
by johnpapdu 14y ago
That's not Amdahl's law in reverse, that's just Amdahl's law as applied to mulitcore. This was all worked out over a decade ago [1].
[1] M. Hill and M. Marty. Amdahl’s law in the multicore era. Computer, 1998.
- ChuckMcM 14y agoTwo things, first the link is better: http://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/60554/TR1593.pdf?sequence=1 http://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/60554/TR159... And second that was done in 2007 (did they do an earlier version?) Its worth a read.
- solarexplorer 14y agoThis is an excellent reference, I also thought of it when I read this post. Here is the version from IEEE Computer. It's the same article, but has more colors. ;-) http://research.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/ieeecomputer08_amdahl_multicore.pdf http://research.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/ieeecomputer08...