4 ms·
I have a great Blu-ray player at home, but it's unused owing to the ridiculous prices of the media. Sure the detail is great, but it's got to compete with Netfl
by Mordor 14y ago
I have a great Blu-ray player at home, but it's unused owing to the ridiculous prices of the media. Sure the detail is great, but it's got to compete with Netflix for home viewing. In addition, Netflix allows me pause and watch this anywhere on my Nexus 4/7.
A Blu-ray copy of John Carter is equivalent to 2 months Netflix subscription, or 3 months in Blu-ray 3D.
Could have watched John Carter 3D in the cinema (ignoring the poor reviews) only to realize I'd never watch it a second time at home in Blu-ray. 1 month's Cineworld subscription is the same cost the Blu-ray 3D.
- roc 14y agoNot to mention the anti-consumer nature of blu-ray and dvd these days: the unskippable commercials, trailers and anti-piracy warnings? These are also not present on Netflix. Some commercials are present in some content on Hulu Plus. But even that is far, far less than what you have to deal with when renting or buying a retail disc. To say nothing about new releases trying to push people into 3D prints that were rarely good (let alone worthwhile), more-often sloppy and always carried the negatives of eye-strain, dimness, unnecessary cost, etc. [1] Which is all just to say that the economics of film are changing because film-going and retail discs have been continually decreasing their value proposition while their digital alternatives have been continually increasing theirs. [1] Not letting people BYOGlasses is absurd. Even if theatres allowed it, most film-goers would inevitably forget and just buy them anyway. They're really only punishing families with that kind of policy. Families who already have plenty of good reasons to ignore the theatre.
- senthil_rajasek 14y agoOr you could rent it at a local Redbox Or stream from vudu.com or a bunch of other places.