2 ms·

I’m sure they’ll say they haven’t seized the property yet… They’re just holding onto evidence. After Michael spends thousands on lawyers fees to get it back and

by jrs235 14y ago

I’m sure they’ll say they haven’t seized the property yet… They’re just holding onto evidence. After Michael spends thousands on lawyers fees to get it back and prevent a default judgement and seizure he might get it back. This could turn into one of those ridiculous, United States vs Buddy (yes against the property not the person) cases where Michael will have more trouble defending the boat as only a third party witness if they allow his testimony… After all they’ll claim there is no known rightful owner and that it was abandoned at customs. Sick.

jrs235 14y ago
Really? A downvote? Has anyone else ever heard of United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._$124,700_in_U.S._Currency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._$124,700_in_U.... I would not doubt that if you asked DHS if they seized his property that they would say they haven't and that it is currently being held as evidence. He'll probably get his boat back but not after a legal fight costing several thousands of dollars.