5 ms·
There are too many people who were responsible, and most of them were just doing there jobs. Who would you pick as responsible, especially when laws aren't brok
by megablast 14y ago
There are too many people who were responsible, and most of them were just doing there jobs. Who would you pick as responsible, especially when laws aren't broken.
It is too simplistic to run around decrying the fact that nobody was jailed.
- RexRollman 14y agoJust doing their jobs? Who's just description says "fraud" on it?
- damoncali 14y agoThe credit crisis was not caused by fraud.
- fnordfnordfnord 14y ago>>There are too many people who were responsible, That makes it more important to sort it out, not less. >>and most of them were just doing there jobs. That's never been a good excuse for anyone caught delivering a load of drugs. >>It is too simplistic to run around decrying the fact that nobody was jailed. No, not really. Jailing people is our answer to almost every problem. We imprison people even when it is obvious that imprisonment has a strong counter-productive effect. Yet, in one population where I'd argue that imprisonment would have a strong deterrent effect... nothing. It's not as though there is a lack of evidence of serious crime, either. On the contrary, criminality in finance is so glaringly obvious that people are tiring of pointing it out, while others simply work around it knowing that nothing will be done.