4 ms·
And Linux would boot at native resolution, making the contents of your screen microscopic and useless. Linux isn't ready for High DPI.
by lawnchair_larry 14y ago
And Linux would boot at native resolution, making the contents of your screen microscopic and useless. Linux isn't ready for High DPI.
- sbrother 14y agoI'd argue that Unity looks much, much better on high DPI. I run it on an old crappy 1024x768 and a newer 1920x1080 of around the same size, and the icons/launcher actually look sane at almost double the DPI of the older screen. Unity makes the low-DPI computer look (and feel) like a toy, but I like it a lot on my new computer. I'd agree with you if you're running Gnome 2, or KDE, though.
- tr4656 14y agoWell the thing is that most people don't prefer Unity and neither do I. I don't really think that there are so many devs using Unity either.
- CrazedGeek 14y agoWho is "most people", exactly?
- lmm 14y agoI'm ready. I realise some people aren't, but I'm young with good vision; "microscopic" is exactly what I want. I'm buying the extra pixels so I can fit more on my screen, not so I can fit the same stuff with better-rounded edges.