3 ms·
Yes. And when they said "no" to radical chemotherapy, they were sued and forced to pay for it. (It turns out to actually reduce patient outcomes.)
by danielweber 14y ago
Yes. And when they said "no" to radical chemotherapy, they were sued and forced to pay for it. (It turns out to actually reduce patient outcomes.)
- rdl 14y agoOnly the government would have the ability to say no, in practice, and wouldn't due to politics (saying no means you'll be actively opposed by that person's family/etc., and it will be used in campaign attack ads; saying yes is a marginal increase in cost spread out over everyone.