"The title is sensationalist and misleading. The photo taking clearly wasn't the problem because the author wasn't removed from the plane after taking the photo

"The title is sensationalist and misleading. The photo taking clearly wasn't the problem because the author wasn't removed from the plane after taking the photo" "Captain: Sir, you are not flying on this flight. Me: Can you tell me why? Captain: My FA tells me she told you to stop taking pictures and you continued to take pictures." I mean, sure, this could be the lie theyre using to cover up the real reason. But when we're two liars deep in the process, its kind of hard to figure out what the truth is. I get that they could have been lying, but calling this sensationalist is infinitely more ridiculous. They told him he was kicked off a plane for taking pictures, he made that his headline, you said he was being sensationalist. How does all that logic connect? "they were removed after they said something they shouldn't have." This is my whole point. The fact that we will literally throw someone off a plane if the word terrorist is said, regardless of the context, is absolutely deplorable. Why shouldn't he have done that? Because he should have assumed he was speaking to a liar who has no ability to understand context? I don't want to have to assume this is the case when i talk to other americans, so maybe we can stop with this bullshit?