3 ms·

But if something isn't expressible in plain language, how could anyone claim to have a valid contract about it? that sounds like the very definition of "uncons

• derleth 14y ago
  > But if something isn't expressible in plain language It is expressible in plain language. The scenario I brought up states that the person responsible for expressing it in plain language did so in a way that might have left a loophole or otherwise failed to capture all of the subtleties the legal language version expresses.