3 ms·
There's a surprising lack of people and candid shots compared to the last 10,000-shot panaroma by 360 Cities several years ago! I assume that has to do with th
by drucken 14y ago
There's a surprising lack of people and candid shots compared to the last 10,000-shot panaroma by 360 Cities several years ago!
I assume that has to do with the timing of the shots. These seem to have been taken very early in the morning and towards the beginning of autumn (based on clothing).
Unlike the 360 Cities panaroma, there are far less discontinuities this time, though I have already found a significant one [1]. I guess the almost 5-fold increase in shots is the source of the improvement.
Also, the depth of view in this panaroma is ridiculous! You can actually clearly see individual people playing soccer or walking through very distant parks...
[1] http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8425&view.vlookat=5.7463&view.fov=9.9230&imarkerath=-96.8425&imarkeratv=5.7463 http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8425...
- simple1 14y agoAccording to a tower clock I found, this picture was taken at 1:40. Edit: In the "low resolution" image, the clock reads 1:38. In the second level of zoom, the clock reads closer to 1:41.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- drucken 14y agoAccording to a tower clock I found, this picture was taken at 1:40. A tower clock I found shows approx. 09h10. http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=161.5165&view.vlookat=14.6570&view.fov=1.3723&imarkerath=161.5165&imarkeratv=14.6570 http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=161.5165...
- nakedrobot2 14y agoHi, This image was shot on a Sunday in October. The London 80 Gigapixel (which I also made) was shot in August. I think that explains the relative lack of people, here.