3 ms·
Yep, you're partially right: http://imgur.com/vFTvFTP http://imgur.com/vFTvFTP However, it's worth noting that it works fine in IE8 if you have it set to IE8 S
by jrajav 14y ago
Yep, you're partially right: http://imgur.com/vFTvFTP http://imgur.com/vFTvFTP
However, it's worth noting that it works fine in IE8 if you have it set to IE8 Standards mode. (http://imgur.com/GEuyx8X http://imgur.com/GEuyx8X) I'm sure that, like me, you had it set to IE7 Standards mode for testing purposes. Even jQuery itself no longer supports IE7.
- jrochkind1 14y agoIt is a misconception that JQuery no longer supports IE7. > First of all, let’s be very clear: The jQuery team does “worry about” IE 6/7/8, with jQuery 1.9. We’ve created a legacy-free jQuery 2.0 in order to address the many situations where older versions of IE aren’t needed. Some glorious day in the future, jQuery 2.0 will be the only version you’ll need; until then we’ll continue to maintain jQuery 1.9. http://blog.jquery.com/2013/01/14/the-state-of-jquery-2013/ http://blog.jquery.com/2013/01/14/the-state-of-jquery-2013/
- lobo_tuerto 14y agoYou sure? From: http://jquery.com/browser-support/ http://jquery.com/browser-support/ jQuery 1.x IE 6+ jQuery 2.x IE 9+ "Any problem with jQuery in the above browsers should be considered and reported as a bug in jQuery."
- jrajav 14y agoSorry, I misspoke. I meant to say that they no longer support IE7 (or apparently IE8) going forward with the new version, 2.x.