3 ms·
Looks quite nice. On a high-traffic site like this, I'm surprised they've not really addressed performance. Currently: Scripts at the top, not the bottom CS
by radio4fan 14y ago
Looks quite nice.
On a high-traffic site like this, I'm surprised they've not really addressed performance.
Currently:
Scripts at the top, not the bottom
CSS not concatenated and minimized
JS not minimized
GZIP not enabled on the server
Icons not in a sprite sheet
Also, invalid HTML.
I know, I need to chill out.
- emn13 14y ago... and it is indeed rather slow for such a simple site.