3 ms·
The first question I always have when I read headlines such as this is "Who paid for it?" I filled in the form for to download the report and it contains the f
by Flenser 14y ago
The first question I always have when I read headlines such as this is "Who paid for it?" I filled in the form for to download the report and it contains the following:
Disclaimer
The tests reported upon in this document are conducted by us using our own test tools under test conditions chosen by us. The
test conditions were chosen by us to reasonably represent what our customers would experience using our Service with their
representative environments and workloads. The tests have been designed by us to only look at the performance aspects of the CSPs
that we believe are relevant to our customers – it is intentionally narrow in scope. Nasuni is not in the business of benchmarking
CSPs, certifying test results or selling performance metrics. We have attempted to make sure the tests are fair and consistent within
our selected parameters and have worked with several of the vendors to confirm our results. Our tests are not meant to indicate
performance from each CSP under ideal conditions to the CSP, and, in any event, performance should only be one factor of many in a
CSP selection process.
AFTER EDIT:
and from the conclusion (which is worth reading):
While Microsoft has secured the leadership position
this year, it is quite possible that things could change
again next year. In the two years this report has been
published, there was a different leader each year.
AFTER EDIT 2:
From the second page of the article:
Based on the findings of the report, Nasuni uses both Azure and AWS public cloud resources as part of the company's enterprise storage offering.
If you don't want to fill in a form to read the report, there's an infographic:
http://www.nasuni.com/blog/193-comparing_cloud_storage_providers_in http://www.nasuni.com/blog/193-comparing_cloud_storage_provi...
- eplanit 14y agoYou beat me to it...I was primed to type "How much did Microsoft pay for this review?". That said, I cannot make any direct accusation. But, having been in this industry for >25 years, I did learn long ago to be very leery of such reviews when made by an industry "trade rag". I know from having worked for very large technology companies that, cynicism notwithstanding, reviews in trade rags are indeed often "bought".
- Flenser 14y agoIndeed, from my quick scan of the report it looks like it was done in good faith. It could be that MS influenced Network World to publish it. Even if I knew they had I'd still be more favourably disposed towards Azure having read this report: Microsoft consistently performed better than the other CSPs in the tests, delivering the best Write/Read/Delete speeds across a variety of file sizes, the fastest response times and the fewest errors. Not only did Microsoft outperform the competition significantly during the raw performance tests, it was the only cloud storage platform to post zero errors during 100 million reads and writes. In those categories where Microsoft was not the top performer (uptime and scalability variance), it was a close second. In contrast, I'd much more wary of using Google Cloud Storage after reading this.