3 ms·
That's not "less UI", it's just a different UI with fewer graphical elements. I'm not arguing against it-- he's come up with a simple DSL, and exposed that to
by michael_dorfman 18y ago
That's not "less UI", it's just a different UI with fewer graphical elements.
I'm not arguing against it-- he's come up with a simple DSL, and exposed that to the users-- but what would it mean to have "less UI" and maintain a given feature-set?
- access_denied 18y agoLess UI in your sense can indeed lead to user friendlyness. One example: I use a plain textfile as my PIM. Why? Because data viewer and editor are the same. Not even a mouseclick away.
- melvinram 18y agoHow is it not less UI, if he reduced multiple screens and buttons to one text box? He literally reduced the quantity of interfaces a user interacts with. I'm not convinced that we can treat "less UI = better app" as an axiom but I don't see your point.