5 ms·
If you want to try PDF.js from your current browser, here's a demo: http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/web/viewer.html http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/web/viewe
by twoodfin 14y ago
If you want to try PDF.js from your current browser, here's a demo:
http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/web/viewer.html http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/web/viewer.html
I wonder what's keeping this so ugly in Chrome. Also, does anyone know if printing is intended to work? It doesn't appear to have the pagination right, again at least on Chrome.
- comex 14y agoAlmost bearable in MobileSafari on my iPhone. Almost... well, I guess the limiting factors are mostly under Apple's control, not pdf.js's.
- comex 14y agoSelf-reply: judging by its performance in desktop Safari versus other browsers, this is really the fault of Apple's (closed source, so I can't really properly diagnose) rendering code - the other browsers performed much better.
- duaneb 14y agoLooks much better than I imagined. Also painfully slow.
- wildmXranat 14y agoI've got an i5 that runs it smooth like butter.
- SteveMoody73 14y agoMost of the PDFs i read are electronics datasheets and they don't look half as good and it also seems to be missing the bookmarks as well. Scrolling through pages also seemed to take a long time. I think i will have stick to adobe reader for now
- fiatpandas 14y agoThis is really impressive. I tried in both my FF 18 and Chromium, it seems to work fine in both, although I prefer the font rendering in Firefox. This truly is an amazing use of JS.