3 ms·
>> because we complained at some point << That's not true, and you already know that's not true. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4599431 http://news.ycom
by igouy 14y ago
>> because we complained at some point <<
That's not true, and you already know that's not true.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4599431 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4599431
Please stop making this pathetic accusation.
- fijal 14y agoOh, yes sorry, it was completely coincidental. It was correlated in time though.
- igouy 14y ago>> It was correlated in time though. << Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a well known fallacy. Lest anyone forget that your repeated complaints don't withstand scrutiny -- http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4598737 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4598737