3 ms·

"Explorers will each need to pre-order a Glass Explorer Edition for $1500 plus tax and attend a special pick-up experience, in person, in New York, San Francisc

"Explorers will each need to pre-order a Glass Explorer Edition for $1500 plus tax and attend a special pick-up experience, in person, in New York, San Francisco or Los Angeles." Interesting. Now we gladly apply for the chance to pay a company $1500 plus tax for a product.

ngokevin 14y ago
I'm sure you could eBay it off for a lot more.
kaolinite 14y ago
It's not a product yet. It's a development device and it has a lot of interest. Having to pay $1500 for it will mean that the people who apply will be serious about building things for it. It's like applying and paying for a development kit to a games console, etc.
- cyphersanctus 14y ago
  Fair enough. Nevertheless, a company like Google could certainly afford to be gracious with developers and let them contribute to the future product's success without making them pay a hefty amount.
  - dferlemann 14y ago
    Think this in Google's perspective. If developers are begging to take their money, why would they refuse?
    - ZeroGravitas 14y ago
      I think it's more likely they want to filter for people that are serious about it.
  - ImprovedSilence 14y ago
    There still has to be a barrier to entry, or everybody and their mother would apply, and just leave the glasses sitting around on the table when they got bored with them. The price tag will weed out all but those serious about developing for glass and few peeps with disposable incomes.
- ErikAugust 14y ago
  If it came with a Glass development kit, I would gladly pay a lot more.
swalsh 14y ago
Its a gamble, but if glass actually becomes a thing its the opportunity to be one of the first developers in the market. That's worth $1500
- Nikkau 14y ago
  It's not a gamble a sec. You can flip them at least 10 times the price day one for sure. A lot more if you wait. People love making collections of expensives things.
dorkrawk 14y ago
I'm guessing that they made a finite number of this version because they'll be making a lot of improvements and new versions in the future. In order to make those improvements they need lots of data about how people use the product. People are more likely to use a product a lot if they paid $1500 for it than if they got it for free.

ngokevin 14y ago

I'm sure you could eBay it off for a lot more.

kaolinite 14y ago

It's not a product yet. It's a development device and it has a lot of interest. Having to pay $1500 for it will mean that the people who apply will be serious about building things for it. It's like applying and paying for a development kit to a games console, etc.

cyphersanctus 14y ago
Fair enough. Nevertheless, a company like Google could certainly afford to be gracious with developers and let them contribute to the future product's success without making them pay a hefty amount.
- dferlemann 14y ago
  Think this in Google's perspective. If developers are begging to take their money, why would they refuse?
  - ZeroGravitas 14y ago
    I think it's more likely they want to filter for people that are serious about it.
- ImprovedSilence 14y ago
  There still has to be a barrier to entry, or everybody and their mother would apply, and just leave the glasses sitting around on the table when they got bored with them. The price tag will weed out all but those serious about developing for glass and few peeps with disposable incomes.
ErikAugust 14y ago
If it came with a Glass development kit, I would gladly pay a lot more.

swalsh 14y ago

Its a gamble, but if glass actually becomes a thing its the opportunity to be one of the first developers in the market. That's worth $1500

Nikkau 14y ago
It's not a gamble a sec. You can flip them at least 10 times the price day one for sure. A lot more if you wait. People love making collections of expensives things.

dorkrawk 14y ago

I'm guessing that they made a finite number of this version because they'll be making a lot of improvements and new versions in the future. In order to make those improvements they need lots of data about how people use the product. People are more likely to use a product a lot if they paid $1500 for it than if they got it for free.