4 ms·
I believe the article mentioned that signs of such an event would be visible in the cosmic microwave background radiation, and right now we have not seen them.
by tribe 14y ago
I believe the article mentioned that signs of such an event would be visible in the cosmic microwave background radiation, and right now we have not seen them.
- splat 14y agoSince the bubble expands faster than the speed of light, it would not be visible in the CMB. The reason that there should be billions of years left is just a statement about probability. Given that the universe has already lasted for billions of years, it would be very unlikely for it to end tomorrow (in fact the odds would be about one in a trillion). So at the very least the universe should last for at least about as long as it's lasted so far (though it could last much longer).
- ElectroPrime 14y agoActually, no, the bubble is supposed to expand at the speed of light.
- colomon 14y agoAs I understood the article, the bubble collapses at the speed of light. If I'm understanding you correctly, you're arguing that since we've had 15 billion years so far with no collapse, then odds are great that we've got billions more to go. My point is that if the bubble collapse is not instantaneous, then we don't actually know there's been no collapse so far.