O hey, just found the heap profiling runs. As you can see, the C++ version uses much less memory (also the C version by the OP uses 73MB - whoa; The OCaml#3 mi

O hey, just found the heap profiling runs. As you can see, the C++ version uses much less memory (also the C version by the OP uses 73MB - whoa; The OCaml#3 might report 12MB, but the C++ version clocks in at just 12KB. I'm guessing he C++ version would use the same order of magnitude as the OCaml#3 on comparable input sets, though) Command: ./c-version Massif arguments: (none) ms_print arguments: massif.out.18434 MB 73.22^# |# |# |# |# |# : |# : |#::::::::::::: : |#: :::::::::::::@::::@::::::@:: : |#: :::::::::::::@::::@::::::@:::@::::@:::@:::: : |#: :::::::::::::@::::@::::::@:::@::: @:::@::::::::::@:::: : |#: :::::::::::::@::::@::::::@:::@::: @:::@::::::::::@::::::@:::::: |#: :::::::::::::@::::@::::::@:::@::: @:::@::::::::::@::::::@::::::@:::: 0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->Gi 0 16.24 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Command: ./cpp-version Massif arguments: (none) ms_print arguments: massif.out.18391 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KB 12.15^@ |#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : |# : 0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->Gi 0 11.17