3 ms·
The old quantum suicide argument? It's not an especially cheerful idea, to be honest. Even if that argument works -- and to be fair, this is about the best pos
by Filligree 14y ago
The old quantum suicide argument?
It's not an especially cheerful idea, to be honest. Even if that argument works -- and to be fair, this is about the best possible scenario for it -- it's too easy to generalize.
There's no particular reason you should limit your self-identification to just the other branches you exist in in this universe. The full argument is a bit oversized for this site, but.. consider that there are branches where you've got the exact same past as here (as far as you can tell), except that you're actually living in a simulation being run by some alien.
If you accept the notion of quantum suicide, and also provisionally this expanded version, then consider that even if the proportion of timelines in which you live in simulations (and thus, the credence you should give to such claims) is low now, a sufficient number of vacuum collapse events could actually change that over time.
- baddox 14y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Darwinism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Darwinism is another fun read.
- wcoenen 14y agoI don't mind that generalization. I feel that modal realism[1] is the only sensible way to explain why anything exists at all. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_realism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_realism