This title is a bit misleading. I read it and figured that she was "told" this (that she only got the interview because she's female) by someone who was in a po

This title is a bit misleading. I read it and figured that she was "told" this (that she only got the interview because she's female) by someone who was in a position to know. Only after reading the article did I figure out that the intended meaning is closer to "Stanford CS freshman encouraged to believe she only got Twitter interview because she's female". EDIT: For the record, I think the actual article is very interesting (much more so than the one I thought I was going to read), and it is this that motivated my comment. EDIT 2: Aaand now it's been replaced by the article's own headline, which unfortunately tells us almost nothing when taken out of its original context. Sigh.