Yeah, because citing a lot of papers increases your credibility and you can go ahead with promoting whatever agenda you had in the first place ("evidence-based

Yeah, because citing a lot of papers increases your credibility and you can go ahead with promoting whatever agenda you had in the first place ("evidence-based approach", as they call it). In the long term, protein has a strong association with improved bone health and a lower risk of fracture (18, 19). Additionally, studies don’t show any association of high protein with kidney disease in otherwise healthy people (20, 21). In fact, two of the main risk factors for kidney failure are diabetes and high blood pressure. Eating a high protein diet improves both (22, 23). If anything, a high protein diet should be protective against osteoporosis and kidney failure! The quoted studies actually question the presence of evidence that a high protein diet contributes to renal or liver diseases, they do not provide any evidence of absence of those ill side effects, that's quite a difference. Bottom Line: Newer studies have proven that saturated fat does not cause heart disease. Natural foods that are high in saturated fat are good for you. Of course the amount of saturated fats you consume and how the rest of diet is composed does not matter at all here... The low-fat, high-carb diet is a miserable failure and has been proven repeatedly to be vastly inferior to lower-carb, higher-fat diets. And "low-fat, high-carb" is of course a fully accurate and meaningful description of a diet. Seriously, do not get your nutrition advice from SEO landing pages with bulleted lists.