The concept of regardless is lost in a meritocracy given the terms of measurement are defined by the the dominant group, which may or may not reflect the requir

The concept of regardless is lost in a meritocracy given the terms of measurement are defined by the the dominant group, which may or may not reflect the required knowledge for the betterment of the system. For example, if you have a computer science scientist judging the validity of a physics experiment, you are not doing the physicist and physics justice, are you? If your meritocracy supports computer scientists, what chance does the physicist have?